Saturday, August 8, 2009

Beaning in Baseball

Baseball has a long history, dating back into the 1800’s. The basic rules of the game were created then, and simply changed as the players and the game itself has changed. One of the older rules in the game is the Hit by Pitch or in statistical terms HBP. In 1887, it was decided that if a player gets hit, then they are awarded first base. Seems fair enough, as long as the player was not hit in the head. At that point, seems like someone is going to the hospital.

It does not hurt a batter, from a statistics standing, to get hit by a pitch. In fact, it helps their On Base Percentage. Most of you know about the HBP and probably have seen some guys get hit and cringe after seeing it. But I’m not here to talk about the history of the rule. I’m here to talk about current major league players and how they are dealing with getting hit.

Craig Biggio got hit a modern era record, 285 times and never once complained. In fact, here’s a video of him taking one off the noggin, getting up and trotting to first base.



Prince Fielder got hit the other night during a game in which his team lost 17 – 4.


He got pretty upset about it too. He charged towards the Dodgers clubhouse only to be stopped by security, Ryan Braun and the rest of the Brewers roster.




He is just one of a growing number of baseball players upset about getting hit.

David Ortiz and Kevin Youkilis have gone through the media to tell Joba Chamberlain not to throw at them. The Rays and Red Sox have a history of bad blood through beanings, but Ortiz and Youkilis don’t seem to care if the Rays hit them. Search on Youtube “Rays vs Red Sox Brawl” if you don’t know what I’m talking about. Dustin Pedroia was pretty irate on Thursday night when a 96 MPH fastball from Mark Melanchon of the Yankees hit him on the shoulder.

Mark Teixeira got upset when Vicente Padilla hit him this year when the Rangers faced the Yankees. Of course this stemmed from Teixeira taking him deep twice the first time he faced him in his career. Padilla plunked him after he got taken deep twice by Teixeira. Then when they were teammates in Texas, Padilla would plunk the other teams best player so Teixeira would get plunked.

Current players are getting increasingly upset about being hit by pitches. The HBP has been part of the game since it started. Either intentionally or accidentally, players have been getting hit since the inception of the game. It has been used a tactic for pitchers since the hitter was no longer allowed to call where the ball was pitched.

Bob Gibson made a reputation for himself for throwing up and in on guys who would dig in when they faced him. He hit over 100 batters in his career. No one ever complained then.

Even Randy Johnson and Roger Clemens had reputations as “headhunters” and as pitchers willing to hit batters to send a message. No one complained about them.

Hitters today only think about themselves and how they can make a buck. They do not want to get hit because it could hurt them and diminish their stats. That is a valid point. But they have to understand that pitchers are just doing their job and don’t want to keep giving up extra base hits or mammoth home runs. The pitchers are trying to “get theirs” as well. Even if that means plunking a guy in the back, leg or shoulder. The hitters need to just deal with it. As long as pitchers don’t throw at a guys head then intentionally hitting a guy is ok in my book. It’s part of the games history. Only 1 person has ever died from being hit by a baseball, and that was in 1920 when they didn’t have hard baseball helmets. So Prince Fielder, David Ortiz, Kevin Youkils, Dustin Pedroia, and Mark Teixeira suck it up. You don’t want to get hit, get out of baseball.

Baseball is a chess match, and whoever can win the psychological game has more of a chance to win the physical game. Ozzie Guillen knows this. Which is why he does send out pitchers from his bullpen to plunk guys. Don’t expect it to be DJ Carrasco, though, he doesn’t throw hard enough.

Saturday, August 1, 2009

That Feeling of Loss

It's that time of year again, yes I am talking about Fantasy Football season. When grown men pour countless hours into mock drafting and projecting stats for men they do not know. All in the hope that they can be champion of their FF league.

I myself am in a couple leagues, but I am not a man who puts in a lot of time thinking about this stuff. Even for fantasy baseball, I do not mock draft or project a lot. I know who the good players are and try to get them. It is that simple.

Fantasy football is another beast however. I do read a magazine and a few articles to prepare for the upcoming season. I mainly use one fantasy sports website for all of my fantasy football needs. I get their magazine in the mail and subscribe to their website, which is updated daily and almost by the second. The name of this website? Well I hate giving out my fantasy sports secrets, but it is www.rotowire.com.

The guys and gals over at rotowire are going to help me make a big decision this offseason. It is about keeping one player over another for one of my fantasy football leagues. A little background on the league first.

I joined this league, run by a former co-worker, back in 2006 when one owner backed out. It is a keeper league where you get to keep 1 player a year without losing a draft pick. The team I inherited was atrocious. The only player I could consider keeping was Antonio Gates. By the luck of the draw, I was to have the number 1 overall pick in the upcoming draft. So I was set with my keeper, Gates, and was waiting on the decision of another owner in the league to determine his keeper. He was lucky enough to have drafted LaDainian Tomlinson and waiver claim Larry Johnson. He went to the playoffs, but did not win the league. He chose to keep Larry Johnson, meaning that I could take LT with the first pick. I did so. I made the playoffs in my first year in fantasy sports, thanks to LT's record setting season. I did not win the league as my team fell apart in the playoffs.

The next season I kept LT, which I should have done considering how well he had just played. His numbers tailed off, as they should have, but he still had a good season. I did not make the playoffs, as I drafted poorly. I kept LT for the 2008 season and made the playoffs. I ended up winning the league too! All the while, dealing with an underperforming LT and inconsistent Marion Barber as my running backs. I did however end up with solid receivers, which I had not had in any of my years playing. Larry Fitzgerald, Steve Smith and Roddy White all played a part in my success last year.

I have just started to prepare for the upcoming season and I now have a dilemma. LT has been my obvious keeper these past couple seasons. Well all the preseason rankings, on rotowire.com, are placing Larry Fitzgerald as the 4th best player in fantasy football. Not 4th best wide receiver, 4th best player. LT is barely in the top 20, at number 18.

I have the 7th overall pick in the draft, and should be able to get a good running back if I choose to keep Fitzgerald over LT. However, I know if I do not keep Fitzgerald, he will be gone in the top 6 picks. I highly doubt that I would be able to snag him at the 7 spot. LT, on the other hand, should be available at the 7th pick.

But if he is not available, it will be like a gut shot from Mike Tyson if he goes and has a great season. I will lament my keeping of Fitzgerald, even if I do make the playoffs and win the league again. It is that feeling of loss and doubting of my drafting abilities that will gnaw at me all year long. I can't even begin to imagine what it would feel like to have LT blow up in a playoff game and be the reason why I do not advance in the playoffs.

Well, I am off to determine which player to keep. Or maybe I will just give myself a frontal lobotomy and forego this fantasy football season.